Safety, risk and the refugee crisis
Peace, safety, serenity |
It gets complicated. Or does it? The
voices are many and loud urging Canada to take in more refugees from
Syria, and to do it quickly. Meanwhile, other voices are cautioning
that this mass migration is a perfect opportunity, for instance, for
ISIS to infiltrate Western countries for the purpose of terrorizing
us. How can we both take in many refugees quickly and ensure that
they're truly refugees and not hiding in the migration population
with sinister purposes in mind?
There's an old saying that no good
deed ever goes unpunished. As an MCC volunteer in Europe, I
facilitated the relocation of a refugee family from Hungary to Canada
under the sponsorship of a Mennonite congregation. Despite the best
efforts of the congregation to welcome and settle the family, it was
very soon clear that the church and MCC were being used; the family
disappeared shortly after arrival and turned up in a Hungarian expat
community in Toronto.
All involved felt the sting of good intentions
and actions going unrewarded.
Problem is, the failures in the aiding
of refugees can form a handy excuse for inaction when real crises
impact real people as in Syria and Iraq at this time. And failures
there will be. Resettlement into an unfamiliar culture with languages
that sound like gibberish, with winters that are so unbelievably cold
and without the comfort and support of a familiar faith community has
to be risky no matter how generous sponsors may be. Such a refugee
surge as we're currently seeing is bound to include a few
reprobates as well; our Canadian population obviously includes a
percentage of ne'er-do-wells and worse; why should the Syrian
population not be similar in this regard?
But the Christian gospel in whose
light much of our population has been raised is obviously not about
avoiding risk, quite the contrary. Extending love, even to enemies,
is not only an imperative in the gospels but is a winning
strategy—to put it crassly. Although in our world today, that
message is largely “not on,” for those who profess a faith in the
trans-formative power of generosity, the way is made clear:
hospitality is not withheld just because there's a risk involved.
Love is a way of life.
ISIS will not be defeated militarily;
there is a chance though that love will soften and begin to break the
evil that inhabits that organization. And if some of their number
should happen to slip in through the refugee program and should
happen to successfully carry out a terror attack, those for whom
safety trumps hospitality will have cause to say, “we told you so.”
But some will understand that hospitality isn't withdrawn even when
accompanied by uncertainty and risk.
Love has, after all, been known to end
in gory crucifixion.
Comments
Post a Comment