May the Spirit be with You

-
Coming soon to a flower bed near you!
Along with others, I imagine, I’ve wondered about the nature of the third member of the trinity, the Holy Spirit, or Holy Ghost. Reading on the subject exposes two distinct views: the spirit is like a person or is better described as an influence. If the former, we’d be led to believe that the Holy Spirit acts somewhat like a person, that is, moving about at will, thinking about things and making decisions, knocking on doors and being admitted—or not—and hearing and speaking to us as friends do.
Rev. William Evans understands the Holy Spirit to have personality as opposed to being only what he calls, “an influence.” He argues, “No one but a person can take the place of a person; certainly no mere influence could take the place of Jesus Christ, the greatest personality that ever lived. Again, Christ, in speaking of the Spirit as the Comforter, uses the masculine definite article, and thus, by His choice of gender, teaches the personality of the Holy Spirit. There can be no parity between a person and an influence.”
Commenting on John 3:8, Richard Ritenbaugh has written: "Like the wind, spirit is invisible. A person cannot see it move or work. However, one can see the effect of what the Spirit does. One can see how it acts on things—like the wind going through a tree full of leaves. One cannot see the wind, but everyone has seen how it makes the tree's leaves and the branches sway. Some have perhaps witnessed a strong wind knock a nest out of a tree or rip leaves or branches off a tree, but not the wind itself. It is the same with the Spirit. The Spirit moves, and we then can see people react. The people do things. A work gets done. What we see is not the Spirit itself, but the Spirit's fruit."
Both understandings can be supported scripturally.
Rittenbaugh’s take on the Spirit as an influence that we cannot see, but whose effects are visible, seems to be supported in Paul’s letter to the Galatians: (5:22-3) “ . . . the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.” In other words, where these fruits are present, they are signs of the spirit’s influence, like leaves blowing past our window tell us there’s a wind. (It’s noteworthy that missing in Paul’s list are speaking in tongues, ecstatic emotional states, falling down on stage with video cameras present.)
I’ve said before that we anthropomorphise God and the Spirit (we conceptualize them as persons). Perhaps that’s the only way our imaginations can deal with the spiritual side of our reality. But this also introduces a problem, namely the temptation to say things like “the Spirit was here in the room” in a similar way to “Uncle Jake was here in the room.” If Uncle Jake was in the sanctuary on a Sunday morning, it’s assumed he wasn’t somewhere else. Applying the same logic to the Holy Spirit implies that we know where the Spirit is present and where it’s not. Evangelical Pentecostalism has effectively fallen prey to a heresy and in so doing, has helped to confuse much of the Christian world on an extremely important theological concept.
Not that speaking in tongues or experiencing emotional ecstasy are anti-Spirit. That we should feel joyous and celebratory in the presence of a people who have caught the spirit of “love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control” should surely be expected. ("Are joy and self-control at odds,” one might wonder, particularly if one is a Mennonite?) The mistake would be to say such feelings prove that the Spirit was present. Well of course it was! But if the people were not led to grow the fruit promised by Paul, one has to wonder if the feelings weren’t raised by something else.
The Spirit most assuredly and simultaneously is always here . . . and under an umbrella on a beach in Bocas del Toro.
Unless, of course, there’s never any wind there.

Comments

  1. TYNApril 17, 2016 at 5:20 PM

    Wonderful, George! The one biblical passage that always gives me goose bumps is Ezek 37, where the "spirit" (read also life giving breath) comes into the bones in the killing fields of exile. Love the way that Spirit is connected there to life itself, enlivening creation in all its manifestations. Just to add to your "spirited" musings.

    Tom

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more