The Substance of Things not Seen
Now
faith
is the substance of things hoped for; the evidence of things not
seen. Hebrews 11:1, KJV
Do I have faith?
Do I know what people mean when they say they’ve lost faith?
Hebrews
11:1 “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for; the evidence
of things not seen.” The interpretation of this verse seems to have
been a struggle among translators and theologians forever. For a long
list of a variety of understandings, click HERE.
Hebrews
11:1 sounds like Paul’s attempt to define faith as
if he were writing a dictionary entry:
Faith (n.)
\fāth\
the substance of things hoped for; evidence of things not seen.
In
other words, If you are hoping
that there will be peace on earth, for instance, and although there
isn’t presently peace on earth, but you maintain the assurance that
there will be
peace on earth, you have faith,
a firm expectation that peace is on its way. It’s not yet, but you
are waiting in anticipation for it. You can’t see it, but you know
it’s coming. You see evidence of its approach. You have faith.
Did
I get that right?
Conversely—I
guess—if you’ve given up on that hope, faith
has been lost.
But
maybe defining a word is always a buckshot operation. Especially if
it’s the approximate translation of another word in another
language.
Merriam-Webster
tells me that the English word, faith,
derives from . . . well, let M-W tell it:
“[From]
Middle English feith,
from Anglo-French feid,
fei,
from Latin fides;
akin to Latin fidere
to trust.” So it has meant—historically—to
trust. So
it’s more than believing, it’s having unshakeable
confidence in.
I’m
reminded of a team building exercise. A person is blindfolded and
asked to fall backwards, that his colleagues will catch him before he
hits the floor. It’s meant to develop confidence
that fellow employees “always have your back.” It’s meant to
build trust, cooperation, confidence . . . faith.
The
distinction between belief
and
faith is
critical, seems to me. I can lose belief
in
the possibility of a literal virgin birth, for instance, and maintain the
faith that
Jesus was special in a way for which “virgin birth,” at the time
of the writing of the gospels, would have been a fitting, appropriate
metaphor.
My faith in Christ remains unshaken; my belief in the possibility, or
impossibility, of a virgin giving birth is, when all is said and
done, irrelevant.
Similarly,
it’s in the confusion regarding belief
and faith that
the creationists have lost their way. Flogging a dogmatic belief
as the foundation of faith
is both illogical and, in the end, actually, faith
destroying. Faith
doesn’t
live in the house of fact vs. non-fact; faith
lives
in an apartment with trust,
confidence
and love.
Are
we confident that the creator won’t let his creation go to rack and
ruin? Are we confident that the Kingdom of God, the realization of
Christ’s dream for all people, is on its way? Are we so assured of
these things that we work joyfully to help them along?
If
so, we always were and will always remain, people of faith,
who embrace “the
substance of things hoped for; the evidence of things not [yet] seen.
Comments
Post a Comment