A Mighty Rushing Wind

-


But a new time is coming. In fact, it is already here. True worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth. They are the kind of worshipers the Father is looking for. (John 4:23)
God is spirit. His worshipers must worship him in the Spirit and in truth. (John 4:24)
That friend is the Spirit of truth. The world can’t accept him. That’s because the world does not see him or know him. But you know him. He lives with you, and he will be in you. (John 14:17)
But when the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own. He will speak only what he hears. And he will tell you what is still going to happen. (John 16:13)
Merriam-Webster lists 13 different uses of spirit, with a number of those carrying sub-meanings. A few that might possibly apply here are: “an animating or vital principle held to give life to physical organisms;” “a supernatural being or essence: such as Holy Ghost;” “the activating or essential principle influencing a person;” and “enthusiastic loyalty [as in school spirit].”1 Only in one, “i.e. a supernatural being,” does Merriam-Webster hint at the possibility of a person-like quality of spirit. 

Of course, dictionaries don’t govern a word’s usage; they just report it. And so what we as Christians mean when we speak of the third member of the Trinity might not be clear to the writers of Merriam-Webster. I’m sure we’d find general agreement that ghost—as folklore uses it—does not express what we mean when we refer to the Holy Ghost. Neither would a comparison to school spirit be adequate. 

But when an assessment of an event includes the words, “the Holy Spirit’s presence was felt by all those in attendance,” something quite particular had to have been observed by the speaker/writer. That that something would have to fit some understanding of Holy Spirit for those present and/or those reading/hearing the words is obvious.
 
Question is, was the Holy Spirit’s presence detected through the senses of those present? Seen, heard, felt, smelled or tasted? Was there “a mighty, rushing wind” as filled the room at Pentecost? Was that something detected—in the example I gave—the same thing that the gospel writers described as “a mighty rushing wind?”2

Biblical accounts are prone to use anthropomorphic representations of God (the God who speaks from a burning bush), elaborate metaphors (Jonah in the whale’s belly for three days and nights) and parabolic teaching (the parables of Jesus, the book of Job). I’d contend that we’ve intuitively known all along that the sign of the Holy Spirit needn’t be the “sound of a rushing, mighty wind from heaven,” but some of our sister denominations have so longed for the physical sign that speaking in tongues, falling down in a healing ceremony or even states of heightened communal emotion have been charged with that duty.
 
Spirit has only one dwelling place, and that’s in human consciousness. It makes no sense to speak of the Spirit in relation to the moon, or Pluto; there aren’t any spirit-containers there. Neither would a planet occupied only by animals ever conceive of spirit. Only human consciousness is capable of imagining spirit by any definition and that has to have been the ground in which the spirit concept was planted and grew. “Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you. (Luke 17:21)”

But it’s a difficult concept, really, to imagine a force, an influence, a life-giving presence that doesn’t conform to our observable world, and that’s probably why spirit has been anthropomorphized; speaking of it as person made it imaginable for people and the stained glass windows, the icons, the statues, the relics and rituals made spirit detectable to the senses for those who couldn’t grasp it any other way.
The writer of John’s gospel (in conjunction with the translators, editors and theologians that followed and made it available to us as we have it today) struggles with the meaning of spirit. “He lives with you, and he will be in you.” How can the spirit be both with you and in you? Especially if it is a he, a male personage? What are the possibilities that such a description would end up in the sensibilities that have broken up—and continue to break up—the fellowship of Jesus' followers? How would it not be a temptation to say, “Lo here,” or “lo there is the spirit. He is in me, but not in you?”
The Apostle Paul probably hit on a better way of explaining for us the presence of the Holy Spirit through the recognition of its evidence: “But the fruit the Holy Spirit produces is love, joy and peace. It is being patient, kind and good. It is being faithful and gentle and having control of oneself. There is no law against things of that kind. (Galatians 5: 22 & 23) Personifying, externalizing the Holy Spirit can result in imagining that there is a personage who will work magic in us that will produce the fruits that Paul lists, something the Galatians passage clearly suggests. More helpful is the imagery that begins with a determination to follow Jesus’ teaching: disciplining oneself to be loving, joyful, peacemaking, patient, kind, faithful and gentle. The action repeated will produce in us a holy spirit, a spirit that is contagious, that when shared with others in work and worship will be like the “sound of a mighty rushing wind.”
500 years ago—this year—Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses to the door of the Wittenberg Cathedral thereby initiating the most far-reaching split in the Church of Christ. It may be time again to consider the presence or absence of spirit in the worldwide fellowship of believers. From my vantage point, the presence of antagonism where love should persist, lamentation in place of joy, conflict where peacemaking is called for, impatience, unkindness, faithlessness, and abuse instead of gentleness exist in our faith as evidence that the Spirit Jesus personified may have left some of our buildings. 

Alas.


1https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/spirit
2And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. (Acts 2:2, KJV)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more