On Ists and Ics and everything between.

-

"Swimming in the same chaotic sea" - Taboga

I’m halfway through rereading Stuart Murray’s, The Naked Anabaptist. As is often the case—I suspect with most people who have spent years studying and teaching the language medium—my mind wanders into the area of words, sentences, paragraphs, grammar, connotation and denotation. Why did Murray use that word? What connotations does this sentence carry that may be unintended? Murray’s use of the English language is generally above serious criticism; he was, after all, born and raised in England where education has tended to emphasize language-arts as core . . . at least historically.

Without even having thought about it much, nearly all of us—I think—have come to know that semantically, words that end in ist are usually nouns and words that end in ic are generally adjectives (words that modify the meaning of nouns). In the sentence, “He’s a sarcastIC AnabaptIST,” the last word categorizes the person, the former adds a characteristic. (You can play a game with this: complete the sentence, “I’m a *******ic *******ist,” and see if you can zero in on the essential “YOU.” You might be, for instance, a “chronic optimist,” or an “ascerbic nihilist,” or a “spastic bigamist.”

So what does this have to do with Murray anyway? Well, Anabaptist is one of those ist words that implies that you either is one or you ain’t one. My Sixteenth Century ancestors had the name, Anabaptist, applied to them in derision: the morons who believed that child baptism was invalid and re-baptized each other as adults. If you were this kind of ist, you faced the danger of torture and execution by fire or water. If you weren’t, well, you were just subject to the ordinary sufferings of this life. Murray traces this history briefly, but takes out much of the ist part by indicating that many people have learned from this history a new way of thinking about faith and practice, so that you can actually be whatever you want, ist wise, but AnabaptistICally modified, an Anabaptistic Adventist, for instance.

But then we’d need to wrestle with the ist in Adventist.

(It’s noteworthy that the first followers of Menno Simons were called, Menists, not Mennonites.)

Ah, well. It’s something we’ve learned culturally. Maybe it makes human complexity manageable for our simple minds. You can’t really know a person—it seems—until you’ve attached a label to him or her. Never mind that the success rate of understanding one another through labels is probably closer to 0% than to 100%, but for better or worse, it’s how we operate. And the labels aren’t always ists or ics; it’s entirely possible—and common—for a brilliant, energetic film producer to turn out to have been a sleazy, prevaricating, misogynistic scuzball. But that would turn out to be just another label that leaves out more than it adds in.

For the record, I’m not Anabaptist, but I’ve grown up Anabaptistic. I’m not humanist, but I’ve become somewhat humanistic. I’m not conservatist because I’ve been nudged toward being much more . . . liberalistic, if you will. I’m not an atheist, but am agnostic when it comes to thinking through stuff using labels. I’m neither misogynistic not feministic; I waffle somewhere between those two poles. I think you get the point.

In the end, I think, we’re all personists, swimming in the same chaotic sea, hoping for an island on which to rest. True, we can be more or less of one adjective or another, but labeling is, as they say, an exercise in nailing jello to the wall.


If Murray is accurately portraying the Anabaptist contribution to peaceful, faithful living, I think the world would be a better place if we were all . . . anabaptistic personists?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more