Simple to say, hard to do

-
Saskatchewan Cacti - Grasslands National Park
“If anyone says ‘I love God’ and yet hates his fellow Christian, he is a liar, because the one who does not love his fellow Christian whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen. And the commandment we have from him is this: that the one who loves God should love his fellow Christian too.” (1 John 4:20-21, NET)

“Whoever claims to love God yet hates a brother or sister is a liar. For whoever does not love their brother and sister, whom they have seen, cannot love God, whom they have not seen. And he has given us this command: Anyone who loves God must also love their brother and sister.” (1 John 4:20-21, NIV)
It seems simple on its surface: You say you love God, then demonstrate it in love for your faith family members. Conversely, mistreatment of your fellow Christians puts your love for God in doubt.

Let’s assume for the moment that “love” here doesn’t mean “warm, fuzzy feeling,” but rather the active and sincere seeking of the well-being of another person—whether you like him, agree with him, respect him or not. Seeking the fulfillment of God’s desire for humankind as demonstrated in Jesus and the task of reconciliation—person to person, denomination to denomination, country to country—is our response to the love-bond with the creator and creation.

Simple to say, hard to do. It takes determined and wisely-directed effort because our impulses pull us strongly in another direction. Seems to me we’re born with a survival, kick-ass gene that may have stood us in good stead in prehistory, but is as detrimental to the common good now as indiscriminate and random sexual behaviour, stone axes and eating raw dinosaur tongue without ketchup.

Here’s a test of our sympathy for 1 John’s stern admonition: Do I listen to the news in hopes of hearing about the demise, defeat of others, like Trump or Trudeau, Wall or Scheer, the pope or Franklin Graham? I know, I do. It takes an effort to act differently, to think, “What happened to some people to cause them to behave as they do? And what can I do to counteract the destructive acts and words in my world? And can I hope and pray for a peace that includes the people I find myself disliking?”
Like I said, it’s hard, man.
But not impossible. A significant metaphor implicit in the cross regards the courage to struggle toward renewal, justice and peace even unto death. That you or I are not up to that is probably predictable; at least in my case. Possibly, I love my life more than I love peace and justice.

The comfortable pew, timid Christianity are probably by-products of not only the denomination-building perversions of the church, but of the natural need in each of us to find a niche in the world that’s safe and comfortable. All of Christ’s Kingdom should be such a niche.

It’s hard to be physician to the world out there when we’re fully occupied binding up our self-inflicted wounds.
Christian Peacemaker Teams as an organization sets out to promote peacemaking around the world. I close with their statement of values, and a link to their website which I’d encourage everyone to visit. (https://cpt.org/)
  • Honor and reflect the presence of faith and spirituality
  • Strengthen grassroots initiatives
  • Transform structures of domination and oppression
  • Embody creative non-violence and liberating love.

Comments

  1. UnknownJanuary 14, 2018 at 2:17 PM

    Well done, George. I need firstly to relate constructively those I meet and know. Beyond that, is this love something that addresses both constructive and destructive structures. If I love those who toil for a living, will I support minimum wages at a living level? Will I withstand a capitalistic system that drains buying power upward to those who already have more than they need?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Geo.EppJanuary 14, 2018 at 4:35 PM

    Well put, Hugh.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more