One Story

-
And it was very good
It seemed ironic to me that Harari’s Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind was first written and published in the Hebrew Language in Israel. Hebrew was also the first language in which creation narratives in the Bible were recorded. But what struck me with greater relevance was the uncanny feeling that the scribes who wrote out Genesis and Harari were grappling with the same story, and more importantly, were coming to similar conclusions.

Take what Harari and others have called the Cognitive Revolution. As an evolutionary biologist Harari sees the road from the primitive through stages to create Homo Erectus (man who walks on two legs) and finally Homo Sapiens (man who thinks). But where humans in Harari took millennia to evolve brains that had the capacity for logic, reason and the ability to analyze and predict along with a self-awareness not seen in other species, the creation narratives summarize this evolutionary milestone with the eating of the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. When living is guided by conscious thought rather than by instinct and intuition, a kind of peacefulness is lost, characterized in Genesis by the expulsion from Eden.

“Then the eyes of both of then were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves.”

Another massive change in human history resulted from homo sapiens’ capacity for logic and reasoning, namely a transition called the Agricultural Revolution. Hunting and gathering had its advantages and disadvantages: the domestication of animals and plants for food eventually eliminated the need for nomadic living, but resulted in the clumping of populations into insular communities where homo sapiens laboured in fields and barns, competed for land, stole each others cattle, etc. In Genesis, the Agricultural Revolution is pictured as the beginning of “by the sweat of your brow” obligation and indeed, early agriculture was massively labour-intensive, subject to weather disasters and worrisome on many accounts.

God said to Adam: “Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life. It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field. By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken . . .”

In fact, there is only one story, although told in different ways. Harari approaches it using the scientific method of discovering, testing and recording the results. Genesis visualizes our origins allegorically. Strikes me there’s a common mythology that transcends both Harari and Genesis, and that commonality is bound up with the struggle first of all to live, and secondly to live happily and long on this tiny, amazing, miracle planet in a cold and impersonal universe. Cooperation—not triumphalism—has the better hope of making this possible . . . for everyone. Creation has, after all, given us brain capacity enough to figure this out.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more