Sir, Give us this bread . . . all the time

-
Now available on KINDLE, coming soon in paperback and hard cover
“Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life. Very truly I tell you, a time is coming and has now come when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God and those who hear will live. For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. And he has given him authority to judge because he is the Son of Man.” (John 5:24-27, NIV)

Reading passages like this in John as if they were literal descriptions of the end of time was a greater preoccupation years ago than it is now. Mennonite “evangelists” here in the Saskatchewan Valley would hold forth in evening meetings on the nature of the end of the world, mostly through the window of premillenialism, if memory serves. Loosely summarized, it’s the belief that the thousand years of peace on earth follows Christ’s second coming, not the other way ‘round.

Perhaps, as some have said, the nature of the end of time was and is not important enough for the Bible ever to have made it crystal clear, or else—like us—the writers of the New Testament were as befuddled about the possibility of life after death—let alone its details—as are we.

Did John understand the following sentence as he wrote it? “Very truly I tell you, a time is coming and has now come when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God and those who hear will live.” I know I don’t.

I could pick away at it and make up some explanation to explain how “a time is coming and is now come” makes sense.

I could go to another translator—New English translation, possibly—and read, “I tell you the solemn truth, a time is coming—and is now here—when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live” but in this case, such help is no help at all.

I could go to the NIV study notes and read “ ‘is coming and has now come’ [is a] reference not only to the future resurrection but also to the fact that Christ gives life now. The spiritually dead who hear him receive life from him,” and I’d be closer to, possibly, Swedenborgian theology that (as I understand it) assumes that Biblical eschatology should be read allegorically, that it’s talking about life during earthly life and not about a massive, apocalyptic event. The “second-coming” in this version happened at Pentecost; heaven is the life lived “in the glow of Jesus’ love,” so to speak.

What seems significant to me is that whatever end-times theology you choose to embrace, the reality is that all of us who have opted into the “Jesus way” could remain united on the actually-important aspects of faith, so that born-agains and social gospel people and Swedenborgians and Catholics and . . . whatever, could all be out there witnessing to the joy of loving mercy, doing justice and walking in the light of God’s goodness. Of the redeeming power of love, in other words.

Being human, unfortunately, the other possibility is that it’s over the details that unity will break down, petty difference divide us into antagonistic cliques, shaming the name of Christ in the world we are sent out to enlighten. It’s when “the world” senses our love, our concern that they find justice, our work to help them survive, our willingness to sacrifice for their benefit that they see Christ.

I’ve lived in a rough, poor community where three branches of Christ’s Church—Conservative Mennonite, Traditional Anglican and fly-by-night-evangelistic-crusades worked hard to steal sheep from one another, dividing Christ up into tiny, competing blocks that confused more than they enlightened. A clear case of entrenched, competing eschatologies. So Sad.

I’ve also seen how under MCC, Food Grains Bank, World Vision and others, unity is achieved when vital, common purposes are kept in sight. So Good.

“For the bread of God is the one who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.” So they said to him, “Sir, give us this bread all the time!” (John 6: 33 & 34, NET)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more