Nothing to fear but fear itself? I don't think so.

-
St. Julians

Lilac blossoms are back in town.

I know a number of people for whom riding in a car when someone else is driving is cause for nervous, apprehensive stress. I empathize with them; I ride in airplanes (which I avoid whenever possible) in an adrenalin-fed, tense state. The immediate, simple explanation is that we have vicariously lived the horror of physical death in reports of crashes, and when we’re passengers—which by definition leaves us with no control over the situation—our unease is heightened.

“And the Lord, he it is that doth go before thee; he will be with thee, he will not fail thee, neither forsake thee: fear not, neither be dismayed.” (Deuteronomy 31:8; Moses encouraging Joshua to enter the promised land boldly. KJV)

Every soldier going into combat must fear physical death; how could it be otherwise when the possibility—in some situations, the probability—of being torn to pieces by bullets, shrapnel, explosions must have been imagined over and over in training? “Fear not, neither be dismayed” indeed.

But the possibility of violent deaths in car or airplane crashes or war’s catastrophes represents only a few of many reasons for apprehension, for “dismay.” Fear of cancer, of earthquakes, of floods, of rapists and muggers, of any number of imagined apocalyptic scenarios is directly proportional to the likelihood of its happening to me, inversely proportional to the control we imagine ourselves having in a given situation.

Seems to me.

I very much doubt that Moses and Joshua knew anything about the mechanics of the adrenalin rush that triggers the fight or flight response in us, that raises our alertness and stress to uncomfortable levels. It’s biological, and it would take another two and a half centuries, for instance, before William Harvey would describe blood circulation. To Moses and Joshua, human anatomy was a black box. Reading Deuteronomy as if the writers had the same knowledge base as we seems to me to be an interpretation error of vital importance.

BUT, there might be some insight to be gained from Moses and Joshua’s conversation: confidence in God’s ultimate purposes can be an antidote to fear. The premium we place on our physical survival is understandable, but where the conviction of God’s leading and guidance are engrained, physical death can be accepted as a very brief—if painful—transition to something better than our bodily survival.

At least, that seems to be implied in Moses’ message to Joshua plus, of course, the assumed certainty that if God is on your side, you can’t lose.

(The battle strategy of luring the Aian military out of the city with a small force and then attacking from the rear has probably informed military strategy ever since, but that’s another story. The killing of all the women and children as well as the soldiers is a difficult read for those who conflate the god of the conquest of Ai with the god of Jesus. Read all about it HERE)

In more modern times, the “Moses message” to generals and soldiers is one of a number of versions of an old lie: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori. It is sweet and honourable to die for one’s country. Throw in the “God is on our side” shibboleth and a uniform and the camaraderie of many men and women being taught to hate a people they don’t know, and you have what I call a Moses war message: a package of incentives that help to quiet fear, make of killing a patriotic game as opposed to the bloody slaughter it always turns out to be.

We provide pharmaceutical or emotional palliatives for natural fear at our peril. Fear of cancer can persuade us to live cleaner lives, for instance; fear of flight may make it easier to rein in our wasteful practice of trading our very environment for speed and convenience; fear of injury in battle could help us to see negotiation and compromise as attractive alternatives to the military “solution.”
Let’s think about that before we take a tranquilizer, allow ourselves to be seduced by patriotic or religious rhetoric.

Let’s revisit our biology; the adrenalin-fed stress response is creation’s way of protecting us from harm. The same creator that gave us eyes to see . . . gave us this.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more