Why are we Here?

-
Michelangelo's Pieta

I was born on December 14, 1941; 25 days later, on January 8, 1942, a baby was born to the Hawking family in Oxford England. His parents named him Stephen. In 1962, I launched my career as a green, 20 year old teacher in a rural school in Saskatchewan; before my first year was up, Stephen Hawking—then in PhD studies at Oxford—would begin to fall down for no apparent reason. He was diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. ALS. The dreaded Lou Gehrig's Disease that robs muscles of potency and renders its victims totally helpless. 

There is no known prevention or cure for ALS.

Even as his physical condition worsened, Hawking continued his studies, probably taking refuge in the burgeoning of his mind as his body continued the inevitable decay called ALS. His amazing thesis on black holes launched him as a scientific leader who, despite the odds, would advance the study of cosmology forward by leaps.

It’s astounding to think that theoretical physics can be done through imagination, even when one hasn’t the strength any longer to pick up a pair of calipers. Speech must be delivered digitally, electronically and some of us have become used to the mechanical, computer-generated voice of Hawking holding forth on subjects we only partially understand.

PBS recently broadcast episodes from the Genius series; the one I watched the other day was a brilliantly done educational presentation called “Why are we Here?” In it, Hawking explores the tension between determinism and free will, the idea of parallel universes and, in fact, is positing the question, “how did we get here?” as opposed to the burning Christian question, “for what purpose were we created?” 

The title of the episode is a bit of a misnomer, seems to me.

I’ll be going to church this Sunday morning. There a purposeful creation will again be assumed in what is said and done. The question any Christian must have after watching Why are we Here? is the same as thinking believers must have had ever since the church harassed Galileo into making a false recantation: why can’t the discoveries of today be added to the wisdom handed down from yesterday? Galileo and Copernicus asserted from their observations that the sun—not the earth—was the centre of the known universe. They were right. What they said was true. How much better would it have been for both believers and for science if the church hadn’t set theology and science at odds?

But it’s not news, I guess, that prophets seemingly have to be stoned to protect us from the truth. The right question for us might be—rather than why are we here—“Why are we so unadaptable to new knowledge?” That was certainly Jesus’ question when he looked down on Jerusalem and wondered how the population could choose not to gather under the loving wings of God to be protected like a hen protects her chicks.

However we understand God, it seems axiomatic to me that he/she is a friend to truth, not a bulwark against it. It may be true that it was particularly for human perfidy that the word stubborn was coined.

It’s an insignificant accident, of course, that Bernie Sanders, Stephen Hawking and I are roughly the same age, give or take a few days. The significant observation on that front, though, is that their voices may well prove to have been prophetic. Granted, you and we and everyone who ever was are mere humans, with all the foibles that go along with that. That alone may be reason enough to assert that we are the only species that is plagued by the "Why are we Here?" question.
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more