On Diversionary Temptation

-

St. Julian Ukrainian Catholic Church
Richard Rohr is a Franciscan priest and teacher. I can’t claim to understand in depth his view of the world or all the essentials of his faith; our understanding is bound somewhat—always—by our growing-up experiences and education. 

I have, however, been reading his daily meditations for some time and gaining access to some insights that experience so far failed to provide. I’m not alone—I’d venture to say—in having struggled always with the quarreling in my own mind and in my Christian home, the church; an unease over a myriad of doctrines and “right ways of doing things,” and wondered how that could ever have grown out of the Sermon on the Mount, the prospect of personal, familial joy and peace that is—according to Christ’s witness—the nature of the Kingdom.

I posted this excerpt from the January 26th meditation on Facebook, so some of you have seen it there. The meditations can be emailed to you daily by going to the Centre for Action and Contemplation website and enrolling.

You might come to consider what is meant by “diversionary temptations,” and if that’s a legitimate sensibility, might further consider into which category you and I have been tempted to divert from “essentials” to preoccupy ourselves with “non-essentials,” and further to debate with Rohr whether certain doctrinal issues that he would consider “non-essential” are really pretty . . . well, essential. But then we’d probably be allowing that debate to be yet another distraction. 
 
Is government’s liberalization of the definition of marriage, for instance, a “diversionary temptation” for our churches? Or is it an essential?
 
More importantly, might it be something that displaces true fellowship, true worship, true action toward the building of the Kingdom?
 
I find that Rohr’s meditations help me gain a clearer understanding of myself, although the emphasis on contemplation in arriving at the peace of Christ is something that eludes me mostly . . . doggone it! I think my “diversionary temptation” of note is freneticism, the inability to stop moving, to fill every hour with “stuff,” lest I be bored to death.
 
Here is the quote repeated:
St. Francis cut to the essentials and avoided what had been, and continues to be, a preoccupation with non-essentials. Even Thomas Aquinas said that the actual precepts Jesus taught were “very few.” But the diversionary temptations have been many. In the Franciscan worldview, separation from the world is the monastic temptation, asceticism is the temptation of the Desert Fathers and Mothers, moralism or celibacy is the Catholic temptation, intellectualizing is the seminary temptation, privatized Gospel and inerrant “belief” is the Protestant temptation, and the most common temptation for all of us is to use belonging to the right group and practicing its proper rituals as a substitute for any personal or life-changing encounter with the Divine.

Enjoy a restful, contemplative Sunday Sabbath.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more