The measures we use . . .

-
The Big Muddy - Southern Saskatchewan
Matthew 7: 1-5
Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.
Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, “Let me take the speck out of your eye,” when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

I remember being a guest-presenter at a men’s breakfast some years ago. It happened to be during the lead-up to a provincial election and comments like, “what’s the point of voting; politicians are all corrupt and on the take,” were common. I decided to base my talk on the passage beginning with “Do not judge, or you too will be judged” in Matthew 7. If I recall correctly, my main point was that if we judge a whole category of people holus-bolus, we’re bound to do an injustice to individuals in the group who are not “corrupt or on the take,” and the term for that is actually prejudice, a word that simply means to “pre-judge.” A simple prejudiced statement would be, for instance, “Conservatism is just fascism in disguise; that man votes Conservative; he’s obviously a fascist." That’s the logic of a prejudicial mindset.

Jesus calls the yardsticks by which we judge others, “measures,” and warns—or promises—that we will be judged by the same yardstick by which we routinely condemn, exonerate or forgive others. So if we use the prejudicial measurement on others, say, then that’s the yardstick that will be used on us by the “judgment.” (It echoes the prayer Jesus taught: “Forgive us our trespasses, as [like] we forgive those who trespass against us.”) He goes on to say that the chastising of a brother for having dirt in his eye should only be undertaken after having recognized and dealt with the dirt in one’s own eye. And for those of us Christians who say that our eyes are clean because we've been forgiven by Christ, we need to think again. Jesus was talking to his followers!

I remember a challenge from someone during the Q & A that followed the breakfast. “But we have to make a judgment about what is right and what’s wrong, don’t we?” The best I could come up with is that that’s a different definition of judge; “what you’re actually talking about is discernment, which is, of course, a laudable and necessary form of judgment. What Jesus is talking about in Matthew 7 is condemnation, not discernment. So in other words, be very careful about condemning others while you remain vulnerable to condemnation yourself; such condemnation will come back to bite you in the rear end."

I can’t remember a time when the condemnation of others, even by Christians, was as blatant, loud and aggressive as it has been in the lead up to the inauguration of Donald Trump as president of the USA. Civil discussion and debate about policies (immigration levels, trade agreements, health insurance, etc.) has been buried under a mighty avalanche of condemnation. It’s as if the world reached a joint decision to slam one another about “the speck [in] your eye, when all the time there is a plank in [their] own eye?”  

There’s a big difference morally in saying, “I disagree with what you’re proposing for these reasons, brother,” and, “You, my brother, are a lying, useless ignoramus!” The measures by which we decide to support/disagree/condemn/judge define our morality in relation to Matthew 7. Jesus set a higher bar than ever existed before and as Christians, we're urged to resist the temptation to judge before we deal with the splintery planks in our own eyes.
That, at least, would help us see more clearly, provide us with the vision for building the kingdom of Jesus Christ in the shape that He intended. “Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.”

You are salt to the earth, but salt that’s lost its saltiness is good for nothing, except [maybe, to de-ice sidewalks in Canada in January.] Our role as followers of Christ is way bigger than, and way different from, de-icing sidewalks.

I think if men’s breakfast invites me again, I’ll be much better prepared.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more