"What good thing must I do?"

-
 Just then a man came up to Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?”
   “Why do you ask me about what is good?” Jesus replied. “There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments.”
    “Which ones?” he inquired.
   Jesus replied, “You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony,  honor your father and mother, and love your neighbor as yourself.”
    “All these I have kept,” the young man said. “What do I still lack?”
   Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
   When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.

In Matthew 19:16-22, (NIV) we have one of the pithiest parables in all of the the gospels, I think. I’d go as far as to say that this passage alone would do as an entire gospel . . . except for one thing: we need the rest to help us figure out what it can mean to “follow me.”

To be successful enough in this world to possess both power and wealth is nothing to be sneered at off-handedly; every day and in every way we teach our children to strive in that direction: “Get a trade, go to college, work hard so you avoid poverty. Make something of yourself, for God’s sake.” And how can we be blamed? It’s biological for us to nurture our offspring, to steer them toward self-sufficiency and adequacy, if not wealth.
So how dare Jesus whisper the perversion in their ears that its not adequacy or abundance or even competence that secures their happiness, but rather the enigmatic and only, “give it all up and follow me,” that secures permanent contentment?
These are not guidance-counselor words: these are words of revolution, more of a guerrilla-like call to action than of anything else. These are not pastor words, but a Che Guevara-like summons to join a radical insurgency. And they were written down by the writer of Matthew to encourage and sustain a tenuous reformation in the brutal tumult of Roman occupation, where violence, even crucifixions were common-place.

Here’s a bit from Martin Klaassen’s History of the Defenceless Anabaptist Churches: “Matthias . . . returning to Palestine, was accused by the Jews of blasphemy against God, Moses and the Law. He was tied to a cross, stoned there and then beheaded with an axe.” (p.31)
However could the rich young ruler be convinced that following Christ would be the key to his eternal reward? It turns the whole world and everything in it upside-down. And are we to understand in our day that it’s through Acts of the Apostles and Paul’s letters to the churches that we are meant to understand what it means to “follow me?” Or should we place our confidence in the Sermon on the Mount rather? Or do both together give us plenty of clues about what Jesus meant by “come, follow me?”
Perhaps in an age where being crucified, stoned and beheaded—as Matthias supposedly was—can’t be the measure of how closely we've followed Christ, the struggle to which we’re called is nevertheless the same as it’s been in every age: that good shall prevail over evil, that the hungry shall be fed, the prisoners freed, the sick be healed, the disappointed comforted. That all people shall be reconciled to one another and to creation.
If we today can engage more fully in that quest, that revolution, by giving up our dependence on what we have and are, then the parable of the rich young ruler can surely resonate with us.

Matthias’ eternal reward did not emanate from his determination to be brutally killed, it was in his perseverance in following Christ in his time . . . no matter the consequences.
“But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions.”

Comments

  1. TYNMay 13, 2018 at 7:19 AM

    ...with prophetic zing! Thanks much, George.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hugh SavageMay 13, 2018 at 7:53 AM

    Thanks for drawing our attention to this pivotal passage, George. It's challenging to figure out how it applies in western culture, but some things are clear.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Democracy or bust

-
Image
  Politics . You can tell how people relate to this word by the way they use it. “I’m not much interested in politics,” for instance, equates it with the day-to-day news about our current government, elections, party dynamics, etc. A narrow definition.                By whatever word we use, it’s clear that the setting and enforcing of the principles under which we form community—and function as community—existed before the word was coined. In families, in schools, in workplaces, on the roads, in the economy, the making and respecting of agreed-to behavioural expectations in a community is the necessary defense against chaos.                How behavioural expectations come to be, how they are altered, how they are enforced … and most importantly by whose authority … is fundamental. The “benevolent dictator” model has a long history: give...
Read more

Do I dare eat a peach?

-
Image
  All the talk of Joe Biden’s unfitness for the position of president of the USA must have others of his age—80 plus—wondering about their own fitness. Most of us octogenarians are well aware of our physical limitations, I think, but mentally? How can I know, for instance, if the lines I’m writing are logically sound, or if they fall somewhere between inane and gibberish? How can I know if my diminished capacity can be trusted to make such a judgment? And what if my friends are too kind to tell me when to close my laptop? Hearing an aging loved one tell the same stories to the same people every day has the able-minded nodding knowingly and cluckingly (that’s a word, isn’t it?). We’re obviously too kind and too hip not to know that people experiencing obvious dementia deserve to be “handled with care,” and we’ve devised places and strategies to preserve for them whatever dignity is still possible. But it’s not dissimilar from the pain-relieving, ointment applying, chair-exercisin...
Read more

Stories We Live By

-
Image
  David Brooks, writer, philosopher and journalist, said in a recent speech to the Aspen Ideas gathering that the current divisive, belligerent mood among the people of earth can’t be attributed to our real-life situations. We have space, food, water, shelter, healthcare enough for everyone, and more. We don’t fight because we need to, he said, but because we carry stories in our heads to which we respond. It's clear that he doesn’t mean story in the same way I meant it when I published a collection of short stories , but there’s something to be gained in connecting the two, particularly when behaviour is guided by, for instance, The Holy Bible , or the Quran , each telling a story by which adherents understand life and by which their actions are governed. Scientists, as a rule, act according to a very different story of life, their exploration guided very much by the saga of evolving nature and the incontrovertible principles that govern all things. Our stories —I think Broo...
Read more